Dear Mass Media and Social Media: Help Stop Terrorism
There are way too many mornings when I awake to read another front-page article about an innocent person who is killed (now, often beheaded) by implacable, bloodthirsty terrorists. These stories appear often in the online equivalent of above the fold (or for people who still buy papers, really above the fold). This morning was no exception when I read about the beheading of Kenji Goto, a Japanese journalist.
From my own memories of September 11 to the “Je Suis Charlie” movement to these latest horrific videos, a thought occurred to me that stirred up memories from when I was a kid. Growing up a baseball fan, the only games I got to watch were those broadcast on network television on Saturdays – the Game of the Week. In the 1970s, it became in vogue to either streak across the field or run around like an idiot until you got tackled, hauled off and likely released a couple of hours later – so everyone could see you on network TV. It still happens (see below), but the impact is largely confined to social media (this video has more than three million views):
In the 70s, the TV cameras used to follow these idiots, tracking them while they tried to elude either the police or stadium security and the announcers would often provide commentary. Then, someone came up with a great idea: STOP SHOWING THE IDIOTS. By denying them what they wanted most – “exposure” on television, the craze eventually went away.
I have been around the media for a LONG time and know that in about every news room in America, the mantra of “if it bleeds, it leads” holds true. The more gruesome the killing, violence, hostage situation, you name it, the more the editors salivate at the increase circulation numbers, eyeballs or TV ratings. it’s true: newsrooms love this stuff. If you don’t believe me, ask a reporter. It gains eyeballs, clicks and readers.
Bloodthirsty animals like ISIS are now exploiting traditional and social media to boast and show off their latest atrocities, and at least the media that I read are more than happy to write prominent articles about it with pictures of some poor soul kneeling before someone in the last, humiliating moments of their lives. And yes, I showed the image above, but to make a point.
There is an all-too-familiar pattern to what is happening today in the poorly named “war against terror.” It goes like this:
- Sadistic, media-crazed barbarians kidnap an innocent civilian
- Said barbarians issue a picture or video, demand ransom and publicize their latest prize
- Media carries the story, along with quotes from said barbaric group
- Demands are not met or ransom is not paid
- Innocent person gets killed, often in bloodthirsty, dramatic fashion, such as a beheading
- Sadistic animals release a video and a statement that is carried VERBATIM by media outlets all over the world, becoming a megaphone for said barbarians
- Impotent world leaders express outrage. Today’s statement from the Japanese government was “Japan strongly condemned the killing, saying an “atrocious act of terrorism” had been committed and that the country was “outraged by the horrific act.”
- Fueled by world attention in mainstream and social media, sadistic, media-crazed barbarians prepare to re-feed the media beast that lives off of “if it bleeds, it leads.”
- Repeat. Again, and again.
Don’t believe me? How about Jerrold Post, director of the political psychology program at George Washington University? He says:
“Terrorism is basically a media phenomenon, You can look at it as a species of psychological warfare waged through the media. Which means that while we know terrorists influence the media, media coverage also influences terrorists.
Well, I don’t own guns. I can’t drop bombs. But I am pretty smart and have worked in communications since the late 1990s, and here’s my piece of unsolicited advice for the print, television, radio and social media decision makers:
STOP REPORTING ON OR POSTING TERRORIST CONTENT.
YouTube and Twitter have done their best to deny social media as a venue for these animals, but it’s difficult and this stuff goes viral – fast. According to a September 2014 article, Forbes reports “With 100 hours of new footage uploaded every minute, YouTube says it doesn’t, and couldn’t, prescreen content, relying on users to flag violations.” I get it. These two platforms have the best of intentions, but are overloaded.
But I’m not done.
ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, Fox News and others: stop reporting on beheadings. Major newspapers like my hometown Washington Post (on which I learned of the latest atrocity), deny the terrorists a cheap propaganda victory. Online news outlets like the Huffington Post: think about what you can do to help win the poorly named “war on terror,” ignore the spike that you’ll see in web traffic and stop being their publicists.
Does this apply to every act of terror? Certainly not. Events like what happened at Charlie Hebdo can and must be reported. BUT – for those editors who make the “write or don’t write,” “report or don’t report” decisions on individual acts of terror accompanied by insane rants, ask yourselves an important question:
By reporting on acts of bloodthirsty violence, are you interested in helping terrorists get out their propaganda, or are you interested in making money?
It might seem complex, but it’s actually pretty damn simple.
Stop showing the idiot on the baseball field. Go to commercial. Deny the idiot/animal their platform.
And take away their power.